I get lots of these calls each year. Luckily for me, most problems research students encounter have happened before so processes or tools exist to solve them. I like to think of myself as a mountain guide. Specifically he was trying to solve some difficult problems to do with construction, design and safety.
Posted on March 12, by pat thomson Please note that I write my blog on weekends. It is not part of my workload or job description. Not every thesis has a section or chapter devoted to a theoretical framework. But a lot do. The examiners have likely been appointed because they know, and possibly use, the same theoretical framing as you.
The examiner therefore expects — and needs — to see something particular to your work. Something that is bespoke to what they are about to encounter.
The examiner wants to know: How you understand your chosen theory — there are usually multiple ways that theories are interpreted. Which have you opted for and why?
What are the advantages of the approach you have taken? That you know the ways in which the theory is already used in the field. Who else has used this approach in ways similar to you?
What can you build on from their work? How you have used the theory — how and where have you brought the theory into conversation with your research? Are some aspects of the theory more important than others to your research? What have you done about these potential problems? But you also need to say why and how it is possible to use more than one approach.
Does one theoretical framing fill in a gap left by the other? Are these theories epistemologically compatible? What tensions are there between them? Has anyone else done this? The examiner wants to know you are on top of the theory. That you know your stuff. That you have expertise.
That you can speak with authority about it. Of course, the judicious juicy quote can be used for a few key points, those occasions where the theorist makes a point, just so.
They want to see that you have read the texts for yourself. They want to see you summarising, evaluating, managing a discussion, stating your take on the theory, explaining your use of it.
You need to know how to explain it.How Theory is Used The social and behavioral science theories used as a basis for health interventions reflect the field, which is both eclectic and in a relatively early stage of development.
The question of how theories are used (or not used) in research and practice is as important as researchers try to ascertain the role of theory in intervention development and evaluation.
The importance of theory-driven thinking and acting is emphasized in relation to the selection of a topic, the development of research questions, the conceptualization of the literature review, the design approach, and the analysis plan for the dissertation study. theories may be strongly based on scientific evidence that would need expert knowledge to challenge, but others are more philosophical and institutional and thus more open to general critical examination.
Theories such as interactionism, phenomenology, and critical theory can be used to help design a research question, guide the selection of relevant data, interpret the data, and propose explanations of causes or influences Previous articles in this series have addressed several methodologies used in qualitative research.
Position your theoretical framework within a broader context of related frameworks, concepts, models, or theories.
As noted in the example above, there will likely be several concepts, theories, or models that can be used to help develop a framework for understanding the research problem. Social and Behavioral Theories 7. How Theory is Used. The social and behavioral science theories used as a basis for health interventions reflect the field, which is both eclectic and in a relatively early stage of development.